# Natural is not a moral standard

Canonical page: https://thejasonsamuel.com/natural-is-not-a-moral-standard

[Home](https://thejasonsamuel.com/) > [Essays](https://thejasonsamuel.com/essays)

# Natural is not a moral standard

Restored from Instagram stories · 29 April 2026

so let me go back to what that specific youtuber and another influencer who’s a doctor are peddling.

the biggest trope i hate is the religious inspired dogma that’s always subtly pushed - where they claim natural = good, unnatural = bad.

natural doesn’t mean safe or better. it’s what it is. it’s not designed for your wellbeing. it’s just what exists.

infact agriculture - which these “naturalists” heavily glorify, circle jerk to, and viciously defend against modern technology - do not understand that it’s one of humanity’s first heavily engineered field.

bananas used to be full of hard seeds. corn was tiny and barely edible. carrots were thin, woody and bitter, wheat doesn’t yield this way, imagine rice. modern food is literally the result of thousands of years of selective breeding.

if you want natural food, you’re literally a brain dead retard who’s asking people to go back to worse nutrition, lower yield - which ofcourse leads to famine, human suffering and death.

there’s no such thing as unnatural. we humans literally are engineers by very definition - us being the most dominant species in this planet.

we literally break nature’s laws every so often.

vaccines - unnatural - saved/saves millions of lives?

clean water systems - unnatural - we prevent disease.

pasteurization? - unnatural - stops contamination. our preservation methods? unnatural - we stop contamination, store food longer, etc.,

nature or if something is natural is not a moral standard. nature merely explains what is, not what should be.

chickens?

there’s no such thing as a natural chicken in our food system anymore. we domesticated wild chickens 7k-10k years ago and even the so called country chickens are literally engineered for us.

broiler chickens are just a special modern breed which are just selectively bred to grow faster and produce more meat. the same process we used for selectively breeding dogs, crops, fruits - every produce that we do.

its literally optimized breeding. the same thing we’ve done to literally every food we eat.

a lot of fear comes from misinfo - growth hormones in poultry are banned in many countries including india. even if someone wanted to use them, its economically pointless and inefficient. just calculate 1 kg chicken price and do the math retards. fast growth comes from breeding + feed optimizations not injections.

any meds you see that are being used - are for making sure the batch is disease free and safe for consumption. nothing would pass through to you as long as you cook it.

its not that these people who’re doing this harmful propagation don’t know this. they do.

*[a point to verify: “nothing would pass through to you as long as you cook it” is an absolute safety claim. it needs to be checked against the specific substances and risks being discussed; the case for engineered food does not depend on that blanket assurance.]*

they do know that. even though they approach everything else scientifically, they’ll drop this conveniently to subtly push their religious dogma inspired push to define which is ethical and which is not so that they can draw new boundaries to the society as to what’s morally right or wrong.

i immediately spot this and what i do - when i see this is to immediately take my boots and stomp it out.

the inconsistency is blaring. if you reject engineered chicken, why do you eat engineered wheat, rice, fruits, use tap water that comes to your house, clean drinking water, milk - any produce? why not reject medicine, vaccines and die early due to diseases? i mean - retarded people dying early in a society with no means to influence others to be retarded is a net positive to the society.

we’re a heavily protein deficient country which is getting an addiction to protein right now. it’s good. good propaganda. we must encourage it more. broiler chicken is the easiest. makes it available for everyone.

if you were concerned about society, you’ll ask something else.

*[a problem with the language here: disagreement with someone’s claims does not make their suffering or early death a desirable outcome. the argument about evidence, food access and nutrition can stand without that.]*

as a socially responsible person, you should be asking really tough questions.

1. is it safe, regulated and nutritionally sound?

2. are those who’re breeding adhering to these safety practices or are they making shortcuts for more profits which affects our society?

3. are they inspected, standardized and consistent?

these are the things your investigation should be about. if someone doesn’t force this - they don’t have any incentive to hold higher standards. we must.

let’s come to the next person.

i dont even need to point out if religious beliefs were an influence to this irrational thinking.

i’ve always considered sexuality and sexual preference as something that;s purely personal and i respect that and i put it on the same level as religion/freedom to practice your own religious stuff. just keep it personal.

i have stood against all of it if it’s forcibly shoved down anybody’s throats. that’s the principle of how we roll down here.

now this person - goes on to make a retarded video targetting people having a specific sexual preference as to what’s natural and unnatural.

leaving aside the medical facts which are also not scientifically true - let me first sort the basic stuff.

this body part is meant to do this. this is natural. this body part is not meant to be used for this or to do that. not natural.

i mean.. come on!

tongues are meant to taste. do you use them for anything else? why even use them during kissing or any other stuff? is that natural?

lips are for what? why use them for kissing? were your hair meant to accessorize how you look? why even do that? is that natural?

why even build your muscles in your body in a gym which is literally engineering resistance unnaturally to build them? is that natural?

why even lighten your skin? is that natural? why even shave? is that natural? why groom? is that natural?

hands evolved for survival. should we ban painting, music or typing? voices evolved for basic signals. should singing be unnatural too? should music be unnatural too?

wait wait. that might be unnatural. sigh.

you’re a medical doctor. you’re a literally engineered profession meant to save the human body against nature’s forces. is that natural?

do you believe in ivf or other unnatural methods to boost reproductive methods? is that natural?

are you such an incel to think that only homosexual people engage in sexual activities that are non-reproductive in nature?

don’t you think hetero people engage in that? even those who actively reproduce with kids do that? is that unnatural?

even animals don’t stick to your rule of what’s natural regarding this. even nature doesn’t support your argument. if you’re appealing to what is natural and what body part is meant to do what - atleast be freaking consistent with your hypocrisy.

you don’t actually believe in ‘natural’ - you’re just using it when it supports what you already think. the question isn’t ’is it natural?’ - it’s ’is it harmful’? if not - why does it bother you?

do you think that’s the only non reproductive sexual activity that’s dangerous? you don’t think any other is not dangerous? with zero sex education anything is. you don’t think a man’s penis can break even during your so-called “natural” reproductive sexual activity?

don’t you think that’s unsafe?

you don’t know vaginismus exists? it’s literally reproductive sexual activity right? do you know how many women suffer in pain in silence because they don’t know how to diagnose and treat?

everything has it’s own danger. everything has it’s own problems. increase education in that space. make it less of a taboo to speak among adults. encourage healthy conversations.

encourage reaching out to professionals who can teach, educate, and treat when you’re in need of this.

do you know how many gynaecs are judgey, bad, and do not know anything about patient confidentiality when they deal with women?

do you know how many of them are super harsh, don’t care about pain, zero empathy when they talk and how many women change gynaecs or some suffer due to this?

so many problems to solve and talk about in our society and our incels are bringing items straight out of their religious inspired manosphere to moral police our society.

stfu. retards.

sometimes when i see these retarded idiots influencing a huge crowd, i think - imagine these incel retard’s vote carries the same weight as my vote in our society.

and i sigh.

and i forgot to tell you the bottom line of our natural/unnatural comment.

we humans have always been the best at engineering. we always engineer. literally everything we need for our own benefit.

do not be ashamed of our magnificence.

remember,

all is ours.

[← Previous essay](https://thejasonsamuel.com/democracy-and-disagreement)[All essays](https://thejasonsamuel.com/essays)[Next essay →](https://thejasonsamuel.com/fraud-is-a-tax-on-ambition)All rights reserved. Copyright © 2026 Jason Samuel